By Michael McCune
Epstein captured the attention of a nation. This isn’t a defense. It’s not denial. And it’s not comfortable. It’s an explanation of how moral outrage is weaponized, why this story disappeared when it mattered most, and why it returned only when it became useful.
Read this slowly.
If it angers you, ask yourself why. Then read it again.
This is not about defending anyone. It's about understanding how power survives by redirecting outrage.
When I said months ago that nothing would come from the Epstein files, I wasn’t guessing. I knew it, and many of you knew it too.
If Epstein had truly been the political weapon people believe, the story would have ended years ago, not resurfaced only when it became useful. If there were anything truly damaging in those files, it would have been exposed years ago, when Democrats controlled the White House, the DOJ, and every investigative lever of power.
They would not have needed media theater.
They would not have needed lawfare.
Real evidence doesn't require desperation.
Donald Trump himself signed the law that forced these releases. Ask yourself a simple question. Why would he do that if they held real threats to him? Because people don’t voluntarily unlock doors that would destroy them. Especially when they don’t have to.
Now let’s be absolutely clear about something that often gets deliberately blurred. Epstein was real. The island existed. What happened to those children was horrific. This is not denial. This is separation of truth from manipulation.
If there were actionable, provable evidence implicating people in power, especially those who funneled millions or billions into the campaigns of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or Joe Biden, It would have been erased long ago.
That isn’t cynicism. That’s how power actually works. People at that level don’t leave loaded weapons lying around. They don’t forget. They don’t “miss” files.
So, consider this question, grounded in common sense. If Epstein truly held political kill-shots, why did nothing come out during Biden's presidency?
Why didn’t Epstein dominate headlines then? Because the story wasn’t useful. Epstein only returned to the spotlight when Donald Trump promised transparency, when he openly said he would release information, when he disrupted a closed system that survives on secrecy. And suddenly, Epstein was everywhere again.
This is how manipulation works.
It doesn’t need convictions.
It doesn’t even need facts.
It only needs just enough photos, just enough association, just enough suggestion to guide emotionally driven minds toward a predetermined conclusion. And before anyone says “this could never work on me,” it does. On all of us. If we don’t slow down and look.
Human nature, especially the part that should be resisted, thrives on moral outrage, and nothing fuels it faster than accusations involving children. Harm an adult, it barely makes the news. Harm a child, and the emotional response overrides logic entirely. That reaction is understandable. And precisely because it’s understandable, it’s exploited.
This is why Democrats and their media allies reach for
anything they can tie to Trump, photos at social events, old flight logs, guilt
by proximity, suggestion without proof.
Because once hatred reaches that level, truth doesn't matter anymore. It must be constantly fed with the same falsehoods that lit the fire in the first place.
Outrage doesn't need truth to survive. It only needs repetition. And if you look closely, you’ll notice something important. Neither Democrats nor Republicans defend Epstein or what happened on that island. That’s not the divide.
The difference is who can’t let it go. It’s Democrats who chase this narrative like a dog with a bone, not because it reveals truth, but because they need it.
Donald Trump continues to produce measurable results, in many cases outpacing what he even campaigned on. And as success accumulates, hatred requires replacement fuel.
So, the same narrative is recycled. The same accusations are reheated. The same insinuations are dragged forward. Not to inform, but to keep the fire burning.
They also know something else. It's the only strategy they have left. They have no policies to run on. They have no results to defend.
So, they must convince you that Trump himself is evil, because if the man is evil, then every policy becomes evil, by association. That way, they never have to debate outcomes.
Ask yourself honestly:
Are they going to run on higher taxes to support millions of illegal immigrants?
Are they going to run on direct conflict with Russia and the risk of World War III?
They can’t. Because we already lived under those policies,
and Americans rejected them.
But here’s the trap. They also cannot adopt Trump’s successful policies, because doing so would be an admission that he was right. So, they’re stuck.
Unable to run with his policies.
Unable to run against their consequences.
Which leaves only one option. Moral outrage.
Twist every sentence.
Rewrite every word.
Assign guilt without proof.
Redirect every failure back to Trump.
Right now, Minnesota is facing one of the largest fraud scandals in American history, and Democrats are blaming Trump for it, even though he wasn’t in office when it began.
Why? Because all roads must lead to Trump, or the spell breaks. Make Trump so hated that people will vote against their own best interests, convinced they are acting morally.
They will ignore manufacturing returning home.
They will ignore energy independence.
They will ignore economic strength.
And they will accept socialism, higher taxes, capital
flight, and national decline, all while believing they are doing the right
thing.
That is how countries fall.
So, America has a choice.
They can wake up.
They can look at the timeline.
They can recognize how they were manipulated.
And yes, that realization is uncomfortable.
But if they refuse to see it, they will continue to be played. Because a mind ruled by outrage is never truly free. It belongs to whoever pulls the strings.

No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome comments and encourage productive, respectful discussion.